Tuesday, March 27, 2007

29th March 2007, 12pm, Taylor's Law School.

Freaking assessed assignment D.U.E. at the time and venue above.

COME JOIN THE FUN (see me go bonkers)!

That's LESS than 36 hours from now.

I too are LESS than HALF DONE!

WARGH!

Haven't even reached quarter, let alone HALF. Pfft!

And i'm blogging now, hmm.

Typical.

FASTER FINISH WORK!

Freaking procrastinator.


-----


My bad memory.

Having not Blog for a few days.

I have ALOT of stuffs i wanted to talk about.

I had even phrase them properly in my head how and the way i want to write it.

But now...

Everything down the toilet bowl *flushing sound*.

My memory is so bad, its worst than a leaky cauldron.


Might edit tonight.

If i remember any.


Edit @ 8:49pm:
I've created a whole new LAW.
Under the Shinhwa Protection Act 2007, sEric (Amane); (<--- read as "Section Eric, sub-section Amane".)
He who abuses Amane shall be liable under the rule "Eric-omma-abuse" and therefore, is required to pay a fine of more than RM1million to kimchi Han, which, after the fine is paid, this rule shall no apply anymore.

Hah! Purr-fect for my NEW COUNTRY =D!

Hehee, shall not disclose anymore from here =P!~


Yeah btw, i was watching LeeHom's Forever Love MV just this afternoon.

I don't get it.

The girl is SIAO with the capitals S.I.A.O.!!!

If i were her, i would've just sticked to LeeHom!
Why even bother getting married to the guy who is, erm, NOT LeeHom!

Freaking HOT, talented, SWEET, plays the piano, HANDSOME and CUTE!

You can say something along the lines that maybe LeeHom screw up, or they just aren't meant together because HE is meant to be with eiko-chan ME, or maybe its insecure around such hot dude...

Freaking hell! Thats an MV!

MV doesn't make sense XD!~

Forget reality, JUST GO WITH THE HOT ONE XD!~

BTW TracyTheMaria dear,
JUST KIDDING!
Its just for entertainment purposes =P! I find it funny, kekeke!
No way i'll be touching LeeHom, cause i have my Super Junior and all =D (And i don't want to die XP!~)!~



Ok enough.

Go do work.

BAH!


Edit @ 11:31pm:

Actually i'm quite pissed off with somebody now.

Just so it was felt whoever won't runaway and whatever won't mind, does not give anyone to feel all the right in the world to say no to people there above said, because it was known the relationship is secure, but however, say yes to people opposite of from what was said above, just so to be socially acceptable.

Its quite ridiculous right?

As much as secure will provide understanding, nobody would like to be treated this way.
Or maybe its just me.

Unless it is clear that there is no enjoyment of the time spent?

Maybe its true.

If so why even bother for the sake of the name stake?

You should know who i'm pointing at and what. If you get the gist of it.


Ah, if only i'm that good in reading judgements.

Freak.

No comments:

 
ss_blog_claim=bb275a7ef194bb6f4b248bf8cfa8ff5e